If fractional values do get applied but are rounded when displayed, we should consider dropping the outer floor function, unless it's preferable to match the displayed values.- Vardis ( talk) 05:51, 16 December 2012 (GMT) Well, I don't have the luxury of time to test out what you mentioned. Neither version accounts for actual cutoff for Fine being between 13 and 14, but since you can't get that without messing with the console, maybe it doesn't matter. I'll grant that using floor based on 65 as the start value explains the 2/6 for the increases before 65, and the 3/7 on the values between the 10/20/30 etc. At least for weapons - I could've sworn I saw fractional damage when I did my own testing. DoomScythe ( talk) 04:59, 16 December 2012 (GMT) The current version results in what gets displayed, but IIRC the display value is rounded and doesn't reflect the actual increase to the base rating. So why not use floor with the precise definition of floor(-1.4) = -2? - Alfwyn ( talk) 18:14, 15 December 2012 (GMT)
What is INT(-1.4)? Rounding that to -1 gives a wrong value for an effective skill of 15. E.g INT (5.467) = 5 DoomScythe ( talk) 17:21, 15 December 2012 (GMT) INT is ill defined, floor has a precise meaning. Here, INT = Integer function which is essentially truncating all decimals of a number. I also believe this is what the Devs initially conceived. I based my formula on the data given by Kai Heilos under Smithing Calculation section, Archive 1. Anyways, here's a much more elegant formula than the current one. I can't believe that it's been more than 1 year since Skyrim was launched and the Smithing formula is still pending. 22 Ancient Knowledge changes the effective skill formula.17 Corrected Formula for Experience Gain from Tempering Items.16 You can't use a gem type/grade if you have one for a thief related quest.14 What Happened to the tips for gaining XP by Crafting and Improving Bows?.
0 kommentar(er)
